
Instructor: Jonathan Bass
Office Hours: MW 1.30-2.30 in Loree 010
Course Description and Policies
Week One
Wednesday, Jan. 21
Week Two
Monday, Jan. 26
Wednesday, Jan. 28
Monday, Feb. 2
Wednesday, Feb. 4
Week Four (News Brief; brief)
Monday, Feb. 9
"Scientists have forgotten all they once knew about memory."
"In a world of cyberdreams, Dr. X is a living nightmare."
"Rutgers bio-geologist Dr. Y has discovered that men really are islands."
Look at other "catchy" openings in Dawkins.
Wednesday, Feb. 11
Week Five
Monday, Feb. 16
Wednesday, Feb. 18
Week Six (Group Presentations; 10 mins)
Monday, Feb. 23
I'll be putting up additional interviews over the next few days and we'll read at least two for Wednesday.
These interviews shd give you some ideas about kinds of questions to ask and responses to expect. Such interviews can appear in more or less transcript form, as with the above samples, or they may be transformed into interview stories, such as the Gorman piece on E. O. Wilson we read in Dawkins. The latter genre, the interview story, brings context, commentary, and narrative into the presentation of the interview, whereas the straight interview piece sticks mostly to the linear back and forth between interviewer and interviewee.
For the midterm assignment, you'll be transforming the interview you conduct with a Rutgers (or other) scientist into an interview story.
Wednesday, Feb. 25
Week Seven
Monday, March 1
Wednesday, March 3
Monday, March 8
Wednesday, March 10
Week Nine
Monday, March 22
Wednesday, March 24
Week Ten
Monday, March 29
Wednesday, March 31
Week Eleven
Monday, April 5
Wednesday, April 7
Week Twelve
Monday, April 12
Enjoy the Holiday Weekend
Wednesday, April 14
Week Thirteen
Monday, April 19
Wednesday, April 21
Today's class will begin with a discussion of the reading, followed by a research session
Week Fourteen
Monday, April 26
(1) The feature story must present and "translate" some area of specialized science, health, or technology related knowledge for a non-expert (but interested) audience. This is a key feature of the genre, something any reader of a science story will expect to (want to) find. As we've been discussing in class, this knowledge may be (among other things):
(3) the human element (connecting the above to people; stressing that connection).
(4) structure (in Jon Franklin's sense or after one of the models or types discussed in class). Minimally, your structure should involve an engaging opening and an ending which returns to or otherwise resonates with that opening.
(5) references: typically, in the feature story, the majority of the writer's sources are other people in interview. You're encouraged to draw on your midterm interview and, if possible, on the recommended second interview. Beyond these, draw on the book read for the book-review, the articles from the news summary, and any other research you find necessary.
Wednesday, April 28
Week Fifteen (Feature Story; 6-7 pp)
Monday, May 3
Tuesday, May 11, 5.30-6.30 pm. Murray 032, CAC.
Papers will be returned and discussed, grades revealed.
Subsequent to this time, your final papers may be collected from a box in front of the office door.
Introduction: Who Is Mister A?

Week Three (Online Source Review; 2pp)
Find an article in a major research journal like Science or Scientific American on a recent scientific breakthrough and write a three paragraph news brief capturing the controversy and excitement of it all. Your article should start with a catchy opening phrase that will make people want to read the rest of the story, like
Group One
Michael
Alexis
Andrew
Abigail
Group Two
Rebekah
Chris
Erin
Ananta
Andoyo
Group Three
Maidah
Scott
Nicole
James
Group Four
Samantha
David
Gladston
Carlos
Frank
Week Eight
Class Cancelled
Note: We're meeting today in the Writing Program Computer Lab (135 George Street 105)
(Spring Break: Saturday March, 13 - Sunday, March 21)
Class cancelled for Passover. However ...
(1) the key story structure;
(2) what is new, different, previously unknown, and/or definitely interesting in the science and
(3) if possible, why the science [or findings or new technology] might matter to a particular community or to humanity at large
(1) Introduction
(2) Primary interest of the book (discuss, evaluate)
(3) Secondary interest(s) of the book
(4) Problems, weaknesses, failings, or peculiarities of the book
(5) Summary/conclusion (really a one-paragraph condensed mini-review)
(1) Remember to "translate" the science, that is, to make it easily accessible (and fun) to the non-expert reader;
(2) to present and critically evaluate, the author's argument in the book (e.g., why he or she has written the book);
(3) to specify the intended audience of the book (for whom is the book written? does it succeed in being useful for them?)
Meet in the Computer Lab, in the Writing Program Building, George St.
(a) theoretical or abstract (like the particle physics in Matt Herron's "Strange Attractions");
(2) in particular: knowledge of the new: the feature must bring to your readers some knew discovery, problem, solution, field of study or practice (e.g., narrative medicine).
(b) technical-descriptive (e.g., explaining how a car engine or particle accelerator works);
(c) procedural (or "know how": e.g., a step-by-step guide to building a car engine or particle accelerator or to anatomizing an insect); or
(d) experiential (e.g., describing what it feels like to work daily in a pathology lab or operating theater or to administer a large research facility).
Last Day of Class
Final Office Hour