Home
Polity & Structure
General Convention
House of Deputies
House of Bishops
Provinces
and dioceses of the Anglican Communion
Resources
Argumentation
Data &
Analysis
Documents
Reports &
Events
Tools &
Services
News flashes,
Announcements
Links
Religious
LGBT Christian
General Links
Poetry
Reflections/Sermons
Do Justice
Joy Anyway
Angels Unawares
Louie Crew:
Natter/BLOG
parish
(Grace/Newark)
diocese
(Newark)
province (II)
TEC
assignments
current
calendar
publications
resume
cv
education
software
for writers
Louie Crew
377 S. Harrison Street, 12D
East Orange, NJ 07018
Phone: 973-395-1068 h
lcrew@andromeda.rutgers.edu
Please sign
the guestbook and view it.
Louie & Ernest Clay-Crew
Married February
2, 1974
12/21/1974
8/17/2006
|
Don't
repeat the mistake on page 847 of The Prayer Book . Here is what
God really requires from the chosen people:
Do
justice.
A
series of essays in the Episcopal Church
Response to the House of Bishops Statement from New Orleans
Response to the House of Bishops Statement from New Orleans
By The Rev. Barry M. Signorelli
Having not seen the final
text of the HoB document until late last night, I have since been
calmly and gently (yeah, right!) formulating my response to this latest
bit of hypocritical appeasement. Here are my preliminary observations,
made in between my sputtering fits:
- the bishops are being either ingenuous or, more bluntly, hypocritical
when they tout that "in Christ all God's children, including gay and
lesbian persons, are full and equal participants in the life of Christ's
Church" while upholding -- and removing any ambiguity from -- B-033. We
GLBT people are NOT full and equal participants in the life of Christ's
Church so long as we are categorically barred from any ordained office, no
matter HOW they try to spin it as a "season of waiting." It's total
bulls**t, pardon my bluntness, and they should have the integrity to say
right out that GLBT Episcopalians are second-class citizens being
sacrificed for the idol of uniformity in the Communion. Or at least
apologize for their treatment of us rather than patting themselves on the
back for being so deftly political.
B-033 remains a pernicious evil and a sin against the Holy Spirit; until
it is repealed we do against our GLBT brothers and sisters in the Church
the very violence we condemn in others.
- the bishops seem capable of finding their spines only when their own
authority is at stake; one would like to see them defend the equality of
all baptised Christians with the same zeal they apply to their territorial
prerogatives.
- the continued calls for participation in the "listening process" are
getting old and cloying; we're tired of hearing the HoB encouraging the
dissident provinces to take part in something they plainly want no part of
-- at this point, to GLBT folk it sounds like pious boilerplate claptrap,
because at this point, it is. How about a *demand* that calls the other
Primates to account for failing to keep their promises made at Lambeth?
Again, our bishops were sure able enough to show some teeth when it came
to episcopal incursions.
- calling for civil rights for GLBT folk (actually, only GL folk) rings
hollow in the face of the bishops' hypocrasy regarding sacramental rights.
I want to know, in specific detail, what each bishop is going to do to
follow through on these fine words -- which bishop is going to pick up the
phone to call their government representatives to lobby for equal rights?
And how can they justify doing that in the civil realm when they refuse to
do so in the spiritual realm? GLBT folks see this as just more empty
words, a politically correct sound bite. "Be doers of the word, and not
hearers only."
- As expected, the other side is already spouting that the HoB's
Response is "too little, too late" (that's from +Duncan, who wasn't even
there -- guess it's easier to throw stones from across the street), while
Stand Firm's take is that the break is imminent. I could have told the
bishops that would be the response, yet they once more took the route of
appeasement leading to futility. It's bad enough to be sacrificed, but to
be sacrificed for nothing is even worse.
- I find the ++PB's continued use of crucifixion imagery to be
inappropriate and deeply offensive to GLBT folk. She and the other bishops
may be wringing their hands at the foot of the Cross, but it's their own
hands that have nailed me and my GLBT sisters and brothers up on that
Cross. The fact that Jesus hangs there with us doesn't change the fact
that by failing to protect all their flock, the bishops have taken on the
role of the Roman soldiers.
Okay, yes, I know that the HoB's statement is not as bad as it might
have been, that it simply maintains the status quo and doesn't "go back"
-- but what it doesn't "go back to" is the aftermath of GC2003 and the
shame of B-033. What the bishops have produced will please no one, will
prevent no break-up, keeps GLBT Episcopalians in the back of the bus, and
stifles any voice of prophecy or movement of the Spirit. "The lukewarm I
will spit from my mouth."
Here endeth the rant.
(The Rev.) Barry M. Signorelli
Priest Associate
Church of the Holy Apostles, NYC
An Inclusive Landmark Episcopal Parish
bsignorelli@holyapostlesnyc.org
www.holyapostlesnyc.org
|