Finding Voter Registration Information on NJ State and County Web Sites: It's a Challenge! |
| |
This paper details how easy – or hard – it is to find information about registering to vote and to access a registration form on New Jersey county web sites and on the New Jersey state web site. Originally released in October 2006, this version is updated as of February 2007.
|
TV Coverage about the New Jersey Election in 2005 |
| |
This report, published in June 2006, is about a project that analyzed the highest-rated nightly news
programs beginning 30 days before the election in 2005. With funding from the Henry and Marilyn Taub Foundation, the project worked
with the University of Wisconsin News Lab in analyzing the data. This was a project of the New Jersey Project, Eagleton Institute of Politics, conducted by Dr. Matthew Hale, Seton Hall University.
Full report here
Summary available here
|
Are Negative Campaigns So Bad? |
| |
An article written by Gerald M. Pomper, Board of Governors Professor of Political Science (Emeritus), Rutgers University, published in The Star-Ledger on Sunday, December 4, 2005.
|
| Implementing
the Help America Vote Act (HAVA): |
| |
Next Steps for
HAVA Implementation in 2006 Based on 2004 — and What
It Means for the New Jersey Election in 2005 |
| |
A seminar
held on January 6, 2005, as part of the on-going series on Implementing
the Help America Vote (HAVA), provided more information on the
implementation of voting changes. A brief summary of the seminar
is available here, as well as an updated PowerPoint presentation
and revised report card for gathering information on the implementation
of best practices for voting. |
| |
Can We Alleviate
Risk and Improve Public Confidence When Using New DRE Voting
Systems? |
| |
The New Jersey Project held a seminar on October 8, 2004, as part
of the on-going series on Implementing the Help America Vote
(HAVA). A brief summary of the seminar is available here, as
well as a PowerPoint presentation and report card designed to
gather information on the implementation of best practices for
minimizing problems in elections, two items which were discussed
at the seminar. |
| |
Making Democracy Work:
Issues in Voter Participation |
| |
Ingrid Reed,
Director, New Jersey Project, Eagleton Institute of Politics,
authored this timely piece, which was presented during a lively
roundtable discussion held at the Center for Government Services
in March 2004.
Reed's paper uses research done by her colleagues at the Eagleton Institute
of Politics to present a picture of what is known about voters today and
analyses what can be done through initiatives in public policy initiatives
and better government practice to address issues that can play a role in
encouraging those citizens who don't participate to do so and keep those
who do involved in the democratic process. |
| |
The Challenge of Implementing
the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) |
| |
In the fall
of 2003, the Eagleton Institute of Politics presented a series
of three seminars designed to give New Jersey an opportunity
to gain perspectives from six states – New Mexico, Maryland,
Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and California – on election
reform and implementation of the new federal Help America Vote
Act (HAVA). Posted here are a series of key points from the speakers
at the seminars. |
| |
Election Reform: March
2003 Testimony before the NJ Senate Committee |
| |
Ingrid Reed,
director of the Eagleton NJ Project, in testimony before the
NJ Senate State Government Committee Hearing on election reform
emphasized need for accountability and transparency in the State's
decentralized election administration and cites the new federal
law, the Help American Vote Act, as opportunity for NJ to improve
its voting system.
|
| New
Jersey Election 2002 |
| |
Election
2002: How to Help Voters Pick in Election for Senate |
| |
Eagleton's
2002 Recommendations for Better Campaigns and the Eagleton-Alliance
for Better Campaigns research on coverage of New Jersey races
by NYC network affiliates was featured in a column by Ingrid
Reed that ran the week of October 14th in the Home News and
Tribune, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and The Times of
Trenton.
|
| |
2002
Recommendations for Better Campaigns
This report includes the list of recommendations made by the Eagleton Institute
to help citizens decide whether and how to vote. The recommendations focus
on debates and media coverage in the current campaigns for U.S. Senate and
Hosue of Representatives.
|
| New
Jersey Election 2001 |
| |
Election
Reform: Report on the 2001 New Jersey Election |
| |
The 2001
New Jersey election is the focus of a new report by Ingrid
W. Reed, director of the New Jersey Project. The report
was prepared for the Century Foundation to assess the extent
to which problems evident in the 2000 Florida elections persisted
in 2001.
Summary of
report
Full
report
Read
a review of this report on page 8 of the Fall 2003 Guardian,
a newsletter of the Council on Governmental Ethics Law (COGEL).
|
| |
Press
Release:
Do
New York TV stations shortchange New Jersey voters?
Rutgers' Eagleton Institute of Politics study analyzes Garden State's 2001
election coverage |
| |
The 2002
Senate race in New Jersey between incumbent Robert Torricelli
and Republican challenger Douglas Forrester is shaping up as
one of the most competitive in the country, with the potential
to decide which party will control the U.S. Senate. But how much
will voters learn about the candidates and issues by watching
news broadcasts on New York television? This is the full press
release on this issue and the details of the campaign coverage
issued by the Eagleton Institute and the Alliance for Better
Campaigns.
As reported by Steve Manas in the Rutgers Focus newsletter, February 10,
2003:
|
| |
The
Need to Advertise the Gubernatorial Debates |
| |
Eagleton's
research in the 1997 gubernatorial campaign showed that it was
nearly impossible for a voter to find out when the debates were
on the air. There was no organized effort to publicize the debates.
This proposal was made during the 2001 campaign for a public
education campaign to alert New Jersey voters to their opportunity
to see and hear the
candidates for governor debate.
|
| |
Gubernatorial
Debate Ad Campaign to Alert Voters |
| |
During the
2001 gubernatorial campaign, Eagleton launched an effort to alert
voters. A major grant from the Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and
initial support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the
Community Foundation of New Jersey, have enabled the New Jersey
Project of the Eagleton Institute of Politics to launch the first
public education campaign to alert voters to the gubernatorial
debates. You can read about the campaign and view the ads at
the above link.
|
| |
Poll
Results on What is Helpful to Voters |
| |
At the beginning
of the 2001 gubernatorial campaign, a survey was conducted, in
a joint venture between the New Jersey Project and the Eagleton Center
for Public Interest Polling, to ask about the helpfulness to
voters of different sources of information about candidates.
The results are presented here.
|
| New
Jersey Congressional Campaign 1998 |
| |
New
Jersey Congressional Campaigns in 1998: Not Bad but Not
Enough |
| |
The
New Jersey Project issued a report of the 1998 congressional
campaigns, "Not Bad But Not Enough," by Gerald M. Pomper, Board
of Governors Professor of Political Science and Eagleton Institute
of Politics faculty member, and Ingrid W. Reed, director of
the New Jersey Project. The report is featured in
the November 1999 issue of the New Jersey Reporter.
Links are provided to a report summary of the findings, as
well as the full report.
|
|
Eagleton
New Jersey Campaign Forum History |
| |
The
initial efforts of the Eagleton New Jersey Campaign Forum
included a roundtable discussion with key leaders in the
state on campaign discourse conducted in February 1997 with
key political figures in the state. The Forum agreed that
New Jersey could have better campaigns if several key steps
were taken.
During
the subsequent gubernatorial campaign, Eagleton collaborated
with the national organization, Free TV for Straight Talk
Coalition, to successfully secure time on television outlets
in New York and Philadelphia for "issue spot" statements
by the candidates, a first in the nation in a statewide race.
The
New Jersey initiatives serve a prototype for a national effort
by a new organization, the Alliance for Better Campaigns.
The New Jersey Project has arranged for Institute
co-sponsorship of candidate debates in senatorial and gubernatorial
campaigns and organized election-related discussions and
programs for students, faculty and members of the broader
community. Students at Eagleton are invited to participate
in a variety of campaign-related activities.
|
| |
|
| |
|