(continue with slides from last lecture)
Expected Value
• Option A: 100% chance of $50
• Option B: 50% chance of $100 (50% chance of $0)
• How should Expected Utility Theory be applied to this choice?
• Expected Value (EV) = $____ for both
• What if you prefer A? Is that rational?
• _____! Depending on your utility function for money.
St. Petersburg Paradox
| Hi Option | Lo Option | |
| Choice 1 | 9% chance of winning $5000
90% chance of winning $1000 1% chance of winning nothing |
100% chance of winning $1000 |
| Choice 2 | 9% chance of winning $5000
91% chance of winning nothing |
10% chance of winning $1000
90% chance of winning nothing |
Why isn’t this normative?
| Tickets: | 1 | 2-10 | 11-100 | |
| Choice 1 | Lo | $1000 | $1000 | $____________ |
| Hi | $0 | $5000 | $____________ | |
| Choice 2 | Lo | $1000 | $1000 | $____________ |
| Hi | $0 | $5000 | $____________ |
Allais Paradox
| Options | Red 30 balls | Black 0-60 balls | Yellow 0-60 balls | |
| Choice 1 | Red | $10 | $0 | $____________ |
| Black | $0 | $10 | $____________ | |
| Choice 2 | Red/Yellow | $10 | $0 | $____________ |
| Black/Yellow | $0 | $10 | $____________ |
Ellsberg Paradox
| Applicant | Dimensions | ||
| Intelligence | Emotional Stability | Social Facility | |
| A | 69 | 84 | 75 |
| B | 72 | 78 | 65 |
| C | 75 | 72 | 55 |
| D | 78 | 66 | 45 |
| E | 81 | 60 | 35 |
Intransitivity
Gain Frame