Memory 3
posted 2/15/06
Reading Assignment: Loftus article
Memory research discussed so far:
-
Use _____________ stimuli (nonsense syllables) or word lists or word pairs
unlikely to be encountered ________ the laboratory
-
Study the _____________ of memory and processes that move information from
one structure to another
-
_______________ of the information largely irrelevant
-
Memory/forgetting a result of type of processing, serial order, etc.; not
a function of information content.
A Story
Alternative view
-
Real life knowledge affects memory
-
Bartlett (1932) 'War of Ghosts' story
-
British and Native American subjects read the story
-
Asked to recall it days or years later
-
Subjects (especially British) ____________ the story
-
Rationalized it, made it less ________________
-
Distorted style, making it sound more British
-
Didn't remember ___________, changed other details
-
Instead of primacy & recency effects, parts of the story most likely
to be remembered were the ___________ parts, such as the _____________________
Schemas
-
Schema = _______________- of typical situation, common event or object.
-
How schemas influence memory:
-
1. Influlence ___________________ of information
-
"Washing Clothes" paragraph (Bransford & Johnson, 1972)
-
_______________ / _______________ (Anderson et al., 1977)
-
Whether and how you understand the passage depends on what __________ is
activated
-
Memory for the passage is __________ if an appropriate schema is activated.
-
2. Information congruent with the schema is more likely to be ___________
than incongruent information
-
Leads to _________ recognition of congruent statements that weren't actually
in the story
-
For example, Bartlett's subjects sometimes added a __________ to the end
of the story, even though the original story doesn't have one.
Do schemas have their effect at encoding or at _____________?
-
Anderson & Pichert (1978). Subject read a narrative of a house description
-
Ss in the role of ____________ or prospective home-buyer
-
Perspective influenced recall, even if perspective was adopted (or switched)
__________
reading the story.
-
Shows the schemas influence ____________, not just encoding
What's a Script?
-
Script is like a schema, but
-
Knowledge about the ______________ of events that usually occur in a stereotyped
situation.
-
e.g., going to a restaurant, or the dentist
-
Evidence for Scripts
-
When Ss are asked to list components of a script, there is high agreement
across subjects.
-
Ss can _________ stories reliably according to scripts
-
After reading stories exemplifying one script, Ss can write a new story
that follows the same script, showing that they can abstract out the __________________
Scripts
-
Bower et al. (1979) (p. 221 of text)
-
False recall
-
Ss read 18 passages, each with 6 actions.
-
When recalling the passages, Ss recalled about 3 actions correctly and
1 action that . . .
-
Ordering
-
Ss read lists of actions
-
Actions were in or out of order for the script
-
Ss asked to recall actions in order presented
-
Recall was better when actions were in _________________
Reconstructive Memory
What is memory like?
-
Verbatim memory
-
Like a tape replaying
-
perhaps with some gaps or loss of fidelity, or problems finding the right
section of the tape
-
but an accurate representation of what really happened
-
___________________ memory
-
People put together clues and come up with a good hypothesis about what
probably happened
-
Clues come from the actual target event, but also from other sources
The _______________________ Effect
-
Ss shown slides of a car accident (Loftus et al., 1978)
-
In one slide the red Datsun was stopped by a stop (yield) sign.
-
Later asked "Did another car _______ the red Datsun while it was stopped
at the __________ sign?"
-
Question was consistent or inconsistent with slide for half the Ss
-
Ss later shown both signs (stop & yield) and asked which one the had
seen.
-
Ss reported correct sign (from slide)
-
____% if no misleading information
-
____% if misleading information
Explanations for the Misinformation Effect
-
______________
-
________________
-
Two competing memories
-
Misremember the source of each
-
Misinformation ________________
-
Assume the misleading information is _________
-
If original memory is unclear, use the misinformation
Evidence for _______________
-
Ask Ss if they were given inconsistent information. Only 10% say they were.
-
___________ Ss that they may have been given misinformation does not improve
accuracy
-
Providing financial incentives for correct answer does not improve accuracy
-
Second guess procedure
Second guess procedure
-
Ss see stop or yield sign slide
-
Asked misleading question about a no parking sign
-
Then see ________ signs; asked to pick the one they saw.
-
Ss also give a second guess, in case first guess is wrong
-
If original memory still exists, it should _________________________
-
Instead, second guess has ________ accuracy
Evidence against overwriting
-
McCloskey & Zaragoza (1985)
-
In original test, control group more likely to pick ___________ than misled
group
-
In modified test, however, both groups equally likely to pick hammer
-
Indicates that misled group still has the memory of seeing the ___________
-
Suggests that original memory was not ______________
Evidence against acceptance of misinformation
-
Lindsay (1990)
-
View slide sequence
-
Read narrative with misleading information
-
Wait 48 hours
-
Cued recall test
-
Ss informed that __________________________
-
Result: Ss still showed the misinformation effect
-
Apparently don't remember the _________ of the information
So, what's the right explanation?
-
Overwriting
-
__________ evidence supports this
-
Source confusion
-
____________evidence supports this
-
Misinformation acceptance
-
Lindsay evidence rules ______________
Reconstructive Memory
-
Overwriting old memories
-
Implanting ______________ memories
-
Possible explanation for ______________ memories
Implanting memories
-
Subjects asked to recall memories about 4 childhood events supplied by
a relative.
-
3 events had actually happened; the 4th event was false (about getting
lost in a ________________)
-
Follow-up interviews about these events
-
Subjects remembered something about 68% of the true events and _______%
of the false event
-
Subject often provide detailed accounts of the false event
Impossible memories
-
Maybe subjects are recalling a ___________ incident and confusing it with
the false incident.
-
This account is less likely if subjects "remembered" an ____________ event
(one not easily confused with a similar real event).
Impossible Memories
-
Spanos experiments on infant _____________ memories
-
Subject performance on an experimental task suggests that they were exposed
to particular mobiles during the first few days of life
-
Ss asked to remember their first __________________ (using hypnotism or
guided mnemonic restructuring)
-
Interviewed again a week later
-
70 - 95% of Ss reported some infant memories
-
Control subjects (who got no memory retrieval procedure) had no "real"
memories
-
Of guided or hypnotized subjects,________% said the memories were real;
16% said they were fantasies
Malinoski & Lynn (1996)
-
Ss asked for earliest memory; then probed for even earlier ones (mean age
3.7 years)
-
Ss prompted that most adults can remember events before _______ birthday
if they visualize
-
______% of Ss reported memories of events before age 2.
-
Ss denied making up stories and gave high ____________ ratings
-
Unlikely that these memories are actually true
Demand effects?
-
Maybe subjects are just making up reports to ______________________
-
Ss deny doing so
-
High confidence ratings
-
Give elaborate ____________
-
Talk to people outside the experiment about their "memories"
-
Financial incentives for accuracy don't help
-
Trick to getting a false memory is a strong _____________
-
_____________ question
-
Press for earlier memories
________________ Memories
-
Are these memories special?
-
Are they more accurate than other memories?
-
Niesser & Harsch (1992) study on memories for the 1986 ______________
explosion
-
Next day recall of time and place of hearing the news
-
Delayed recall 2.5 years later