Study Guide for Final Exam
Intelligence
- Contrast the "g"
approach to intelligence with Gardner's
theory of multiple intelligences.
- What are the three parts of
Sternberg's triarchic theory? What does
Sternberg mean by practical intelligence?
- What is tacit knowledge? Give an example.
Cognitive Development
- Research on cognitive
development has shown that young children manifest many abilities at ages
younger than Piaget would have predicted. Give examples of two such
abilities, and describe the experiments that demonstrate these abilities
in infants or young children.
- Define these terms: object
permanence, dishabituation, conservation task, visual
cliff, violation of expectation method
- How does Renee Baillargeon show that babies understand solidity and
continuity of objects? What are
these concepts? What do babies
understand about occlusion, containment, and covering.
Judgment & Decision Making
- What is the difference
between a normative and a descriptive theory?
- Define these terms: reason-based choice, loss aversion, risk
aversion, accessibility, reference dependence
- What is the normative theory
of decision making under uncertainty and why?
- What is the representativeness heuristic? Describe two judgment
biases that result from use of this heuristic. For each one, explain why
it is a bias and how representativeness can
account for it.
- Explain the following
judgment biases: availability bias, conjunction fallacy, anchoring bias.
Why does the conjunction fallacy occur?
- Explain the following
concepts: trade-off, conjunction fallacy, base rate neglect, attraction
effect, dominance
- Apply Expected Utility
Theory to the following example: you are deciding whether or not to get a
flu shot. The probability of getting the flu this winter is 50% with the
shot and 75% without the shot. The relevant utilities are: no shot &
no flu: 1.00; shot and no flu: 0.90; no shot and flu: 0.10, shot and flu:
0.00. What should you choose and why?
- Draw a risk averse utility function for money. Why is it called
risk averse?
- What were
the result of the class peppermint patty/marshmellow
rabbit experiment? What decision bias did this study demonstrate, and how
can Prospect Theory account for it? What alternative accounts (besides
Prospect Theory) would explain the findings? If you were going to
replicate the study, what improvements would you make to the study design?
- Following are a list of
biases. Explain why they violate Expected Utility Theory and how Prospect
Theory can account for them. (Be sure to specify which part of Prospect
Theory accounts for each).
- a. Asian flu framing
effect
- b. Jacket/calculator
mental accounting
- c. Theater ticket
mental accounting
- d. Endowment effect
- e. Certainty effect
- f. Reflection
effect
- Which of the following are
normative and which are descriptive?
- Expected Utility
Theory
- Protoype
heuristic
- Principle of
invariance
- Prospect Theory
- Principle of
regularity
- Reason-based choice
- Attribute substitution
- Compare and contrast system 1
and system 2, as Kahneman describes them.
- What does Kahneman
mean by the difference between "state" and "change"?
Which one is more influential for decisions?
- A patient undergoes a
colonoscopy procedure and afterwards rates how unpleasant the experience
was. What features do and do not influence this retrospective
evaluation?
- Below are two
graphs showing Anabel’s and Bert’s
utility functions for money. Anabel and
Bert are both given a choice between (i)
receiving $25 for sure vs. (ii) a 25% chance to win $100 (with a 75%
chance to win nothing). Which option will each person choose and
why?
|
Anabel
|
Bert
|
|

|

|
- In a class experiment,
students were randomly assigned to either receive a peppermint patty candy
or marshmallow rabbit candy. They
were then asked whether they wished to keep their initially endowed object
or switch to the other object. What were the results? What decision bias do these results
display? Why descriptive theory can
explain why this bias occurs?
- What decision biases occur
when additional options are added to the decision maker's consideration
set? Why do these biases occur?
- Describe the results of the
Schwartz et al. (2004) study on physician decision making.