Lee Jussim, Select Publications and Papers

The Politics of Social Psychology (J. T. Crawford and L. Jussim, editors).  2018. Published by Routledge/Taylor&Francis.
Go here for front matter, including table of contents.

Social Belief and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
2012.  Published by Oxford University Press.
Go: Here for the table of contents, and the proofs of the introductory chapter.

Precis of the book, commentaries, and my reply to commentaries:
Jussim, L. (2017).  Precis of Social Perception and Social Reality.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1-65, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500062X, e1

Anglin & Jussim (2017).  Science and politics: Do people support the conduct and dissemination of politicized research?  Journal of Social and Political Psychology, Vol. 5(1), 142172, doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i1.427.

Jussim, Crawford, Anglin, Stevens & Duarte. (2016).  Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychologyJournal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Jussim, Crawford, Stevens, & Anglin (2016).  The politics of social psychological science: Distortions in the social psychology of intergroup relations.  In P. Valdesolo and J. Graham (eds), Claremont Symposium on Social Psychology and Politics. 

Jussim, Crawford, Stevens, Anglin, & Duarte (2016).  Can high moral purposes undermine scientific integrity To appear in J. Forgas, P. van Lange, & L. Jussim (eds), The Sydney Symposium on the Social Psychology of Morality. 

Duarte, Crawford, Stern, Haidt, Jussim, & Tetlock (2015).  Political diversity will improve social psychological science.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences. (includes target article, commentaries, and our reply).

Crawford, Duarte, Haidt, Jussim, Stern, & Tetlock (2015). It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences. (Link above, to Duarte et al, also includes this paper).

Jussim, Crawford, Anglin, & Stevens (2015).  Ideological bias in social psychological research.  In J. Forgas, K. Fiedler, & W. Crano (eds), Sydney Symposium on Social Psychology and Politics.

Jussim, Krosnick, Vazire, Stevens, & Anglin (2015).  Toward robust scientific research methods in the United States.  An overview invited by John Holdren, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology policy.

Jussim, L. (2012).  Liberal privilege in academic psychology, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 504-507.

Jussim, L., Stevens, S. T. & Honeycutt, N.  (In press).  Unasked questions about stereotype accuracy.  Archives of Scientific Psychology. 

Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., Anglin, S. M., Chambers, J., Stevens, S. T., & Cohen, F.  (2016).  Stereotype accuracy: One of the largest relationships and most replicable effects in all of social psychology.  In T. Nelson (ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed), pp. 31-63.  Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., & Rubinstein, R. S. (2015).  Stereotype (in)accuracy in perceptions of groups and individuals.  Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 490-497. 

Jussim, L., Cain, T., Crawford, J., Harber, K., & Cohen, F.  (2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes. Pp. 199-227 in T. Nelson (ed.),  Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).

Jussim, L., McCauley, C. R., & Lee, Y. T.  (1995). Why study stereotype accuracy and inaccuracy?  In Lee, Y.T., Jussim, L., McCauley, C. R. (eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 3-28).  Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Lee, Y. T., Jussim, L., & McCauley, C. R.  (Eds.).  Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences.  Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 


My book (link at top of page), and the two Behavioral and Brain Sciences articles (links next section) also address stereotype accuracy.

See links to Social Perception and Social Reality, and BBS Precis, at top of page.

Madon, S., Jussim, L., Guyll, M., Nofziger, H., Salib, E., Willard, J., & Scherr, K. C. (in press). The accumulation of stereotype-based self-fulfilling propheciesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rubinstein, R., Jussim, L., & Stevens, S. T. (in press).  Reliance on individuating information and stereotypes in implicit and explicit person perceptionJournal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Cohen, F., Jussim, L., Harber, K., & Bhasin, G. (2009). Modern anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli Attitudes.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 290-306.
The version available here also includes supplemental material rejected  by JPSP -- modern political cartoons  from mainstream media in the Mideast, Europe, and the U.S. depicting Israel and Israeli leaders in a vicious and revolting manner reminiscent of Nazi-era propaganda. 

Jussim, L., Robustelli, S. & Cain, T. (2009). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies.  Pp. 349-380 in Handbook of Motivation at School, A. Wigfield and K. Wentzel (eds).  Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.

Jussim, L. (2005). Accuracy: Criticisms, controversies, criteria, components, and cognitive processes. 
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 1-93.  

Jussim, L., Harber, K. D., Crawford, J. T., Cain, T. R., Cohen, F. (2005). Social reality makes the social mind: Self-fulfilling prophecy, stereotypes, bias, and accuracy. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 6, 85-102.

Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies.  Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 131-155.

Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. J.(1996).  Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations:
Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy.  Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 281-388.  
Part I       Part II     Part III
Review of my own and other evidence on SFPs, bias, and accuracy.  Provides evidence of some of the most powerful self-fulfilling prophecies ever found in social psychology. But it also provides some of the clearest evidence that teachers' perceptions of differences between students from different demographic groups are highly accurate, and that, sometimes, relying on stereotypes can increase rather than reduce the accuracy of person perception judgments (see The Unbearable Accuracy of Stereotypes for more info on this topic). 

Madon, S. J.,  Jussim, L., Keiper, S., Eccles, J., Smith, A., & Palumbo, P. (1998).  The accuracy and power of sex, social class and ethnic stereotypes:
Naturalistic studies in person perception.
  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,  24, 1304-1318.
   Teachers judge students almost entirely based on their achievement.  Stereotype biases are few and far between (though not quite zero). 

Jussim, L. (1991).  Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model.  Psychological Review, 98, 54-73.
Theory integrating the possibility that people's social beliefs produce self-fulfilling prophecies, judgmental biases, and can be accurate, plus a review suggesting that expectations are mostly, though not completely, accurate.

Jussim, L., Coleman, L., & Lerch, L.(1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories.   Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546.

Short Papers
Jussim, L. (In press).  Stereotypes.  To appear in Cambridge Dictionary of Psychology, (D. Matsumoto, Ed),
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Jussim, L. (In press).  Stereotyping.  To appear in Cambridge Dictionary of Psychology, (D. Matsumoto, Ed),
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Jussim, L. (In press).  Teacher expectations.  To appear in The Psychology of Classroom Learning,
(E. Anderman, & L. Anderman, eds.). Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale Publishers.

Jussim, L. (In press). Self-fulfilling prophecies.  To appear in Encyclopedia of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, Levine and Michael Hogg (Co-Editors).  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

A short preliminary report on how to dramatically reduce grandmother death resulting from exams

A short statement about intellectual imperialism within social psychology.

Essays, Blogs, Editorials
Main blog site: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/rabble-rouser

Occasional blogs at:HeterodoxAcademy.org, mostly on political diversity in academia.. 

Haidt, J., & Jussim, L. (February, 2016).  Psychological science and viewpoint diversity.   Presidential Column of The APS Observer, Association for Psychology Science


Haidt, J., & Jussim, L. (May 6, 2016). Hard truths about race on campus.  The Wall Street Journal.


Jussim, L. (August, 2016).  Truth in stereotypes.  Aeon.

Return to Lee Jussim's home page
Return to the Rutgers Psychology Dept. home page.
Return to the Rutgers home page.