DIOCESE OF NEWARK v. BURNS, 83> <N.J>. <594 (1980)
417 A.2d 31
THE DIOCESE OF NEWARK, THE TRUSTEES OF THE EPISCOPAL FUND AND DIOCESAN
PROPERTIES OF THE DIOCESE OF NEWARK, AND THE RIGHT REVEREND GEORGE E. RATH,
PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM F. BURNS, AND THE RECTOR, WARDENS AND
VESTRYMEN OF SAINT MARK'S CHURCH IN ORANGE, NEW JERSEY,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 21, 1980 —
Decided July 24, 1980.
Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Page 595
Bruce D. Shoulson argued the cause for appellants
(Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan,
attorneys; Bruce D. Shoulson and Robin A. Rolfe, on the
briefs).
Eugene M. Haring argued the cause for respondents (McCarter
& English, attorneys; Eugene M. Haring and Gita F.
Rothchild, on the brief).
Adrian M. Foley, Jr., submitted a brief on behalf of amicus
curiae The Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark (Connell, Foley &
Geiser, attorneys; Robert J. Kelly, on the brief).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.
This case is before us on certification of defendants' appeal
pending unheard in the Appellate Division. 82 N.J. 268 (1979).
The factual background and issues involved are almost identical
to those considered in The Protestant Episcopal Church v.
Graves, 83 N.J. 572 (1980), also decided today. Plaintiffs
herein are the Diocese of Newark of the Protestant Episcopal
Church (Diocese), the Trustees of the Episcopal Fund and Diocesan
Page 596
Properties and the Diocesan Bishop. Defendants are St. Mark's
Church in Orange, New Jersey, its rector, wardens and vestrymen.
As in Graves, the essential facts are not in dispute. St.
Mark's Church was originally incorporated in 1827 as "a
congregation of Christians of the Protestant Episcopal church."
In 1832, St. Mark's reincorporated under the act of February 17,
1829 entitled "An Act to incorporate religious societies
worshipping according to the customs and usages of the Protestant
Episcopal Church" and, pursuant to the provisions of that act
changed its corporate name to "The Rector, Wardens and Vestrymen
of St. Mark's Church in Orange, New Jersey."[fn1] Following the
division of New Jersey into two dioceses of the Protestant
Episcopal Church, St. Mark's became a part of the Diocese of
Newark.
St. Mark's acquired its first piece of property about 1828 and
built its church on the site. Thereafter, additions were made to
the church building and additional property acquired. St. Mark's
now owns approximately three acres of land on which is located
the church, rectory, a frame house and parish hall. Financing of
the acquisitions and construction was by local funds only. None
of the deeds of conveyance to St. Mark's make any reference to a
trust in favor of the Diocese or the Protestant Episcopal Church.
Until 1977, St. Mark's, in accordance with Episcopal law,
participated fully in Diocesan and Church activities. It sent
delegates to the Diocesan Convention and regularly paid its
Diocesan assessments and quotas. Following the enactment of the
1877 supplement to the laws regulating the affairs of the
Protestant Episcopal Church, L. 1877, c. 56, now N.J.S.A.
16:12-4, St. Mark's, in conformity with the requirements of that
statute, generally sought Diocesan consent to the transfer and
mortgaging of its real estate.
Page 597
Over the years, St. Mark's had received numerous donations and
bequests of funds some of which were delivered to the Trustees of
the Diocesan Episcopal Fund for management. It is undisputed that
the funds belong to St. Mark's and that of the approximately
$192,000 (at cost) presently held by the Trustees, only $3,788.98
thereof is subject to an express reversionary interest in favor
of the Protestant Episcopal Church.
In 1977, as a result of the same doctrinal disputes as
precipitated the Graves litigation,[fn2] the Wardens and
Vestrymen of St. Mark's notified the Diocese that St. Mark's was
terminating its affiliation with the Diocese and the Protestant
Episcopal Church. Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the vestry
and congregation, St. Mark's affiliated itself with the Anglican
Catholic Church, a denomination other than the Protestant
Episcopal Church, and demanded the return of funds being held by
the Diocese for the benefit of St. Mark's. Bishop Rath
immediately "inhibited" defendant Rev. Mr. Burns, the Rector of
St. Mark's, from performing priestly duties and thereafter
deposed him. See Graves p. 575. A substitute priest was sent to
St. Mark's by the Bishop but was refused admittance and denied
permission to officiate at parish services. This suit followed.
It sought an injunction against defendants prohibiting them from
exercising control over parish property and a declaration that
all property of St. Mark's was held in trust for the use and
benefit of the Diocese of Newark and the Protestant Episcopal
Church.
The case was tried over a period of six days, at the conclusion
of which the trial judge ruled in favor of plaintiffs. He held
that the individual defendants had no interest in the real or
personal property of St. Mark's and "that title to all of said
properties is in St. Mark's." The judgment also provided that the
Rev. Mr. Burns, having been deposed as a priest of the Protestant
Episcopal Church, was not entitled to the office of Rector of St.
Mark's and that the other individual defendants,
Page 598
having renounced their affiliation with the Diocese and Church,
were not entitled to vote or hold office in St. Mark's Church.
Defendants were enjoined from exercising any control over parish
property and prohibited from interfering with the use of the
premises or with the conduct of the affairs of defendant
corporation by plaintiffs or such persons designated by
plaintiffs.
As noted, defendants' appeal was certified while pending
unheard in the Appellate Division. Defendants' argument on appeal
is similar to that made by the appellants in Graves. Defendants
argue that such hierarchical structure as the Protestant
Episcopal Church has, extends only to doctrine. In the absence of
trust provisions, defendants claim that the authority of the
hierarchy does not encompass local church property, which remains
in the control of the local congregation. It is contended that
the offices of Rector, Wardens and Vestrymen of St. Mark's Church
are not vacant and that the Church hierarchy does not have the
right to determine the eligibility for such offices.
Additionally, they assert that the principle of compulsory
deference to the determination of a hierarchical church body in
property disputes has never been the law in New Jersey and that
this Court should adopt the neutral principles of law approach
for resolving church property disputes.
All of these contentions as well as the ancillary points raised
by defendants have been considered and disposed of in our opinion
in Graves. There we approved the hierarchical church approach
utilized in Watson v. Jones, 13 Wall. 679, 20 L.Ed. 666
(1872). Applying that approach to this case, plaintiffs are
entitled to the relief granted. As the trial judge noted, the
title to all property real and personal remains in St. Mark's
Church which was and still is incorporated as an affiliated
member of the Protestant Episcopal Church. The Rev. Mr. Burns has
been deposed as a priest of the Protestant Episcopal Church and
is ineligible to serve as rector of St. Mark's. Likewise, the
other individual defendants have disaffiliated themselves from
the Protestant Episcopal Church and thereby automatically
terminated their eligibility to hold office as Wardens and
Vestrymen of St. Mark's.
Page 599
As was noted in Graves, the individual defendants are free to
disassociate themselves from the Protestant Episcopal Church and
join another denomination. No court can interfere with or control
such an exercise of conscience. However, they may not take the
church property with them. The judgment of the trial court is
affirmed for the reasons set forth herein and in our opinion in
Graves, also decided today.
[fn1] In 1961 the corporate name was changed to read "West
Orange" instead of "Orange."
[fn2] The disputes involved, inter alia, ordination of women to
the priesthood and changes in the Book of Common Prayer.
SCHREIBER, J., dissenting.
I dissent essentially for the same reasons expressed in my
dissent in the companion case, Protestant Episcopal Church v.
Graves, 83 N.J. 594 (1980), decided this day. Moreover, to the
extent that the majority relies upon statutes enacted after the
Act of February 17, 1829, L. 1828, p. 71, under which St.
Mark's was reincorporated in 1832, such reliance would appear to
be misplaced. The reserved power to modify a corporate charter
which retroactively affects rights of stockholders inter se and
with the corporate entity, does not appear to have come into
existence until February 14, 1846. L. 1846, p. 16, § 6. See
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.)
518, 4 L.Ed. 629 (1819).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices SULLIVAN,
CLIFFORD and POLLOCK — 4.
For reversal — Justices PASHMAN, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 3.
Page 600
Please sign my guestbook and
view it.
My site has been accessed
times since February 14, 1996.
Statistics courtesy of
WebCounter.
