Introduction to Sociology (920:101:07-12)

                                                                                  Department of Sociology

                                                                                       Rutgers University

                                                                                             Spring 2006

 

 

Instructor: Paul McLean

Lecture location: Beck Auditorium, Mondays and Thursdays 10:35-11:30 a.m.

Recitation location:  varies by section—consult your own timetable!

Office: Lucy Stone Hall, A336, Livingston Campus

Office Hours: Mondays 1:00-2:30 p.m., and by appointment

Phone: 732-445-3705

E-mail: pmclean@sociology.rutgers.edu

Website with course information, outlines and readings: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~pmclean/

 

Teaching Assistants:

Sourabh Singh: ssingh@sociology.rutgers.edu

Maria Malyk: mvm32@rci.rutgers.edu

 

 

Sociology is the systematic, scientific study of the patterns and processes of social life, touching on all of its major dimensions—economic, political, religious, familial, and criminal, to name a few—and investigating it at both the level of grand social and historical developments, and the level of everyday, mundane interactions.  It is concerned both with individual actors, and with the informal groups and formal organizations that populate the social landscape. 

 

This course cannot be comprehensive in its coverage of the discipline of sociology.  However, it will introduce you to some basic concepts in sociological analysis, some fundamental arguments about the constitution of society and the individuals who comprise it, and important substantive topics and problems in a variety of disciplinary subfields.  What students should gain from the course is a “toolkit” of sociological concepts to apply to their own experience of social life—interactions with friends, relationships with family members, membership in religious and political organizations, experience of the job market, and life in an economically advanced but stratified society—in order to understand that life more fully and experience it more richly.  In other words, my goal is to get you to think critically, and to help you begin to discern, analytically, broad patterns in our lives with each other.  I will pose some of the big questions we face as social beings, and offer some of the most intriguing answers sociologists have provided.

 

 

Grading and Class Format

 

Grading will be based on the following factors: attendance at lectures (10%); a midterm exam during the semester (25%); a final exam during the examination period (40%); and your participation in and testing during the weekly recitation sections conducted by the teaching assistants (25%).  If you fail to show up for either test or the final exam, you will fail the course.  If you fail to attend sections regularly and fail to do the assigned work, you will also most likely fail, at my discretion and at the discretion of your recitation instructor.  Failure to show up regularly for lectures will reduce your final grade by at least one whole letter grade.  You must sign in on the attendance sheets posted before the beginning of each lecture.  Each exam will feature multiple choice questions and written answers, in the form of short essays employing key sociological concepts.  Bring a No. 2 pencil with you to each exam!  Each exam will draw upon not only material in the three assigned books and material provided on my website, but also material that is presented in the lectures.  I intend to lecture upon the ideas of a number of authors that are not discussed in detail in the textbook, so be forewarned!  I also expect you to know concepts and arguments from the textbook that I do not explicitly touch on in my lectures.  I strongly encourage your participation in recitation, and whenever possible, your questions during the lecture sessions.  Thoughtful and energetic participation will enhance your enjoyment of the course, and also improve your performance. 

 


Books and Other Readings

 

There are FOUR sources of readings for this course, three of which are books available for purchase at the Livingston Campus Bookstore, and the fourth of which is my website.  The books are:

 

1.        Rodney Stark, Sociology, 9th edition (Wadsworth Publishing, 2004) (8th edition okay in a pinch)

2.        Eve L. Howard, ed., Classic Readings in Sociology, 3rd edition (Wadsworth Publishing, 2004) (2nd ed. okay)

3.        Mitchell Duneier, Sidewalk (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1999)

 

The first of these books is a general textbook, offering a detailed treatment of basic sociological ideas, and touching on a variety of different themes in the discipline.  You will be tested directly on a number of the concepts and arguments introduced there, and you will learn to apply these concepts to the cases and situations that come up in the other readings and your recitation discussions.  Studying the glossaries at the end of each chapter would be a good start for exam preparation. 

 

The second book is a set of time-tested readings that comes packaged for free with new copies of the Stark book. These readings will help you become acquainted with some of the foundational authors and arguments in sociology, will help you follow some of my lectures, and should be engaging material for discussion and review during recitations.

 

The third book is an ethnographic work—that is, a detailed, analytically informed description of a particular social or cultural milieu.  The goal of ethnography is to inform the reader about the peculiarities of a particular culture or social grouping and to draw the reader into an understanding of that milieu by making the experience of it as rich and as vivid as possible.  Ethnographers aim to render the strange familiar.  The chapters of this particular book are not organized according to the arrangement of themes in this course, but many of our themes—social exchange, social norms, the construction of meaning through social interaction, crime and deviance, the life of the city, the importance of race and gender in America, the negative effects of deindustrialization—are touched on at different points. 

 

The fourth source of readings is my website (again, that’s http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~pmclean/).  Here you will find links to a few very short readings in Adobe Acrobat format, arranged under the Sociology 101 heading and sorted by the week they are required, as well as lecture outlines for the class, and a copy of the course syllabus.

 

 

Lecture Schedule and Weekly Reading Schedule

 

Week 1                   Introduction to the Course

 

January 19:            “A Fundamental Fact: Society Has a Life of Its Own”

 

                                What does it mean to “think sociologically?”  What examples can you come up with on your own of “looking behind” the façade to see social facts more clearly?  What kind of individual motivations and/or large-scale forces can we imagine at work shaping our lives?

 

                                Readings:              1. Peter L. Berger, “Invitation to Sociology,” in Classic Readings.

                                                                2. Stark, pp. 1-8 {8th edition pages: 1-8}

 

                                Note: Recitation sections do NOT meet this week (i.e., January 19)

 

Week 2 of RU Semester

 

January 23:            “Scientific Methods of Measuring and Studying Social Life”

 

                                What are some different techniques for making a scientific study of social life?  What are some of the problems associated with studying social life scientifically? 

 

                                Readings:              1.  Stark, pp. 9-24, 77(column 2)-89, 96(column 2)-103  {8th edition : 8-25, 80(column 2)-92, 98(column 2)-105}

                                                                2.  Duneier, “Introduction”

 

January 26:            “The Overarching Concepts of Structure and Culture, Part 1: Distributions”

 

                                Over the next three lectures we think about some of the different factors constraining our choices or empowering us that work at the level of “social structure” or “culture.”  Social structure may be understood, first, as the numerical balance between different groups in society, and/or, second, as the pattern of social interactions in a group.  Culture may be thought of as sets of rules, recipes, symbols, values, and so on, that shape our understanding of the world; sociologists are concerned with how the cultural features of the groups to which we belong determine social outcomes.  How are culture and structure analytically distinct?  How are our individual life chances a product of large-scale structural and cultural forces?

 

                                Readings:              1.   Stark, pp. 31-35(col 1)  {8th edition : 33-37}

 

Week 3 of RU Semester

 

January 30:            “The Overarching Concepts of Structure and Culture, Part 2: Networks”

 

What can we predict about a group based on the arrangement of and connections between its parts?

 

                                Readings:              1.   Stark, pp. 35(col 2)-39(col 1), 104-107(col 1), 117(col 2)-119, and re-read  pp. 15-16   {8th edition : 38-40, 106-109, 120-122, and reread pp. 15-17}

 

February 2:            “The Overarching Concepts of Structure and Culture, Part 3: Culture”

 

1.        Stark, pp. 39-62   {41-64}

2.         Horace Miner, “Body Ritual Among the Nacirema,” in Classic Readings.

 

 

Week 4                                   Introducing and Comparing Classical Accounts of Social Order

 

The next four lectures constitute a set, introducing you in turn to four major theoretical perspectives for explaining and predicting social outcomes by means of an overview of the arguments made by four significant theorists of social life. 

                                Adam Smith argued paradigmatically that the market is an unintended but beneficial collective consequence of self-interested, individually rational choices.  Individuals are the basic units of society, exchange is the means of self-improvement, and societies essentially are markets.  Karl Marx offers a classic critique of Smith’s ideas by stressing the pervasiveness of conflict and exploitation in social relations, rather than simple exchange, with disastrous consequences for the stability of society as a whole.  These are fundamental yet diametrically different ways of thinking about the basic glue of society, the source of self-interest, and the direction in which society is heading.

                                Emile Durkheim, one of the founders of the science of sociology, stressed how society is like an organism.  He saw individuals as followers of norms who are constituted by the society of which they were a part, and he believed new social institutions arise to fulfill particular social needs.  George Herbert Mead and the Chicago School of sociology stressed the constitution of individuals--their socialization and adoption of social roles--through bottom-up processes of social interaction.  A key question for both of these latter perspectives is, “How many different selves are we?”

 

February 6:            “Adam Smith and Exchange Theory”

 

                                Readings:              1.    Stark, pp. 67-71(col 1), 75-77    {69-73, 77(bottom)-80(column 1)                          

2.        “Adam Smith reading,” on my website 

3.        Duneier, “The Magazine Vendors”

 

February 9:            “Karl Marx and Conflict Theory”

 

                                Readings:              1.    Stark, pp. 112-14, 487(col 2)-489, 234-7(col 1)   {115-116, 498-500, 236-8}

2.        Marx and Engels, “Manifesto of the Communist Party,” in Classic Readings.

3.        Duneier, “The Magazine Vendors” (re-read)

Week 5

 

February 13:          “Emile Durkheim and Functionalism”

                               

                                Readings:              1.   “Emile Durkheim reading,” on my website  

2.        Stark, pp. 110-112, 202   {112-114, 204(col 2)-205(col 1)}

3.        Duneier, “The Book Vendor”

 

February 16:          “George Herbert Mead and Symbolic Interactionism”

 

                                Readings:              1.    Stark, pp. 71-75(col 1), 163(col 2)-173   {73(col 2)-77 and pp. 166-175}

2.        G. H. Mead, “The Self,” in Classic Readings.

3.        Duneier, “The Book Vendor” (re-read)

 

Week 6

 

February 20:          spillover session to conclude discussion of major theoretical perspectives

 

                                Readings:              no new readings assigned

 

The Topic of Social Control

 

February 23:          “Structures and Techniques of Informal Social Control: the Everyday Setting”

 

                                What are we trying to accomplish when we engage in exchange or interaction with others?  Do power imbalances, and therefore command relationships, arise in the course of exchange?  What can we do to resist other people's efforts at exercising control over us?  How is social proximity relevant to the power others have over us, and how prone are we to being controlled?

 

                                Readings:              1.    Stark, pp. 79-82 (re-read), 211-214(col 2), 196(col 2)-201  {83-85 (reread), 213-216, and 199-204(col 1)}

2.        Erving Goffman, “The Presentation of Self,” in Classic Readings.

3.        “Peter Blau reading,” on my website

4.        Duneier,  “The Men Without Accounts”

 

Week 7

 

February 27:          “Structures and Techniques of Informal Social Control: the Experimental Setting”

 

What factors affecting the ability of one actor to control another can an experiment isolate?  And how applicable are experimental findings to real-world situations?

 

                                Readings:              no new reading for today

 

                                                                Deviance, Routine Crime and the Environment of Crime

 

March 2:                “Theories of Crime and Deviance”

 

                                What kinds of acts are regarded as deviant and why?  Is it possible to provide a general definition of crime?  What kinds of people typically perpetrate crimes?  What various theories purport to explain when and why crime occurs?  How does society punish crime, and what is the aim of punishment?  What links exist between the punishment of deviants, and the socialization of non-deviant persons?  What kinds of punishment are the most effective, and/or the most humane?

 

                                Readings:              1.   Stark, pp. 177-196(col 1), 204-5(col 1) {179-199(column 1), 206-207}

                                                                2.   Duneier, “Sidewalk Sleeping,” and “When You Gotta Go”

 

 

Week 8

 

March 6:                “Epidemic Crime, and the Meaningfulness of Punishment”

 

                                Readings:              1.   Stark, pp. 214(col 2)-229 {217-232}

2.        “Michel Foucault reading,” on my website

 

March 9:                MIDTERM EXAMINATION – Bring a sharpened number 2 pencil.

 

 

SPRING BREAK MARCH 11TH-19TH  – ENJOY YOUR HOLIDAY!

 

Week 9

 

March 20:              “The Inevitability of Social Stratification”

 

                                Today we examine in more detail a topic we encountered a few weeks ago when we talked about social structure.  Stratification--the tendency for society to become layered according to the relative status of different groups--is one of sociology's key concepts.  What accounts for this widespread tendency?  What criteria are important for determining status, and how do they differ across societies?  How can we judge whether or not people are able to change their status?  What are the consequences of occupying a particular status for one's tastes, interests, and opportunities?  

 

                                Readings:              1.   Stark, pp. 237-243, 246(col 1)-252  {239-245, 248-254}

                                                                2.   H. J. Gans, “The Uses of Poverty: The Poor Pay All”, in Classic Readings.

                                                                3.   Duneier, “Accusations: Caveat Vendor?”

 

March 23:              “Changes in Social Stratification Across Historical Epochs”

 

                                Readings :             1.   Stark, chapter 10

 

Week 10

 

March 27:              “Analyzing Racial Tension in America: William Julius Wilson, Doug Massey, and Cornel West”

 

                                To many, the problem of race is the most sinister and pervasive problem in contemporary America.  How can we measure the problem of race?  What distinguishes the African-American experience from that of other racial and ethnic groups?  What are the various significances of the “veil” separating blacks and whites according to Dubois?  What are the most important sources of racial inequality in America, and what needs to be tackled in order to improve race relations?  Is racism more of an economic structural problem, or a cultural/attitudinal problem?

 

                                Readings:              1.    Stark, chapter 11

2.        “William Julius Wilson reading,” on my website

3.        Duneier, “A Christmas on Sixth Avenue

 

March 30:                              “Analyzing Racial Tension in America” (continued)

 

                                Readings:              1.    W. E. B. Dubois, “The Souls of Black Folk,” in Classic Readings.

 

 

Week 11

 

April 3:                   “Sex Ratios, Gender Differentiation and Social Inequality”

 

                                The difference between being male and being female is one of the core factors in shaping how we are socialized and determining the opportunities we are given.  What structural and/or cultural factors determine the nature of and/or degree of gender inequality in a given society?  How is the social difference between being a woman and being a man—gender difference—related to the biological difference between maleness and femaleness?  How does our culture produce and reproduce images of gender difference, how do these images change, and with what results?

 

                                Readings:              1.    Stark, chapter 12, plus pp. 169-173 (reread)  {ch. 12, + pp. 171-175}

2.        Duneier, “Talking to Women”

 

April 6:                   “A Culturalist View of Gender Construction and Gender Relations”

 

                                Readings:              no new reading for today

 

 

Week 12

Subfields of Sociology I: Family Life

               

April 10: “The Changing Function and Significance of the Family Over Time”

 

                                We take family as a fundamental social grouping for granted, but its meaning has changed dramatically over time.  In what ways has this occurred, and for what reasons?   How do gender roles affect the practice and interpretation of the interactions occurring between spouses, or the treatment of male versus female children?

 

                                Readings:              1.     Jessie Bernard, “The Future of Marriage,” in Classic Readings.

 

Subfields of Sociology II: Religion

 

April 13: “The Protestant Ethic and the Importance of Religion for the Conduct of Social Life”

 

                                Although we imagine religious belief to be a deeply private experience and personal choice, there are in fact important social determinants shaping the nature and extent of religious belief in a given society.  Why is religious belief more powerful in certain periods and among certain groups rather than others?  How do religious beliefs imprint themselves on the conduct of life in the marketplace and other non-religious gatherings?  What are the cycles of religious belief?

 

                                Readings:              1.   Stark, pp. 489(col 2)-490, and chapter 14  {pp. 500-501, and ch. 14}

                                                                2.   “Max Weber reading,” on my website 

                                                                3.   Duneier, “A Scene from Jane Street

 

Subfields of Sociology III: Formal Organizations

 

Week 13

 

April 17: “Formal Organization and Its Consequences for How We Live Our Lives”

 

                                A vast part of the social landscape today is occupied by formal organizations—state bureaucracies, large corporations, international organizations—which impinge on our lives as consumers, workers, and citizens, and which mediate our relations with each other.  What accounts for the nineteenth century rise of formal organizations?  How do different forms of organization arise in different environments? To what extent does any formal organization operate according to its formal blueprint, and to what extent is it prey to the natural behavior of those who populate it?  Will the postindustrial age require a different species of formal organization?

 

                                Readings:              1.    Stark, chapter 20

2.        begin Duneier, ch.4, “How Sixth Avenue Became a Sustaining Habitat”

 


April 20: “A Toolbox of Concepts for Describing the Mechanics of Formal Organization”

 

Today I will flesh out more of the tables of competing perspectives on formal organizations that I introduced last time.

 

                                Readings:              1.    R. M. Kantor, “Men and Women of the Corporation,” in Classic Readings, 2nd edition, but not 3rd edition; also available on my website.

 

Subfields of Sociology IV: Urban Sociology

 

Week 14

 

April 24:                 “The Traditional Sociology of Urban Life”

 

                                At least three out of four Americans live in an urban place, and urbanization has been the essential handmaiden of industrial development in Western civilization.  How does living in urban places affect our behavior and our relations with others?  What kinds of dynamics characterize the flow of people into and out of cities? 

 

                                Readings:              1.    Stark, chapter 19

                                                                2.    Lewis Wirth, “Urbanism as a Way of Life,” in Classic Readings.

 

April 27: “The New Sociology of ‘the City’”

 

                                To what extent does the geography and the built environment of the contemporary city control the activities and mindset of its occupants?  To what extent is the geography of the city determined by private interests rather than social welfare?

 

                                Readings:              1.    “Mike Davis reading,” on my website

2.        Duneier, finish “How Sixth Avenue Became a Sustaining Habitat,” and read “The Space Wars: Competing Legalities”

 

Subfields of Sociology V: Social Movements and Social Change

 

Week 15

 

May 1:                    “What do Social Movements Want?”

 

                                Social movements are conscious, concerted efforts by groups of ordinary persons to change some aspect of their society by using extra-institutional means.  They are simultaneously extremely widespread and oriented to a multitude of goals, and susceptible to the most modest achievement of those goals.  Why is this? Why do they persist?  What factors best account for the success of a social movement in reaching its objectives, and can those objectives be redefined to institutionalize the movement?  How can social movement participation be enhanced?  How is the morality of social life relevant to social movement participation?

 

                                Readings:              1.   Stark, chapter 21and pp. 83(col 2)-89 (reread) {ch. 21, + pp. 86-92}

2.        Duneier, “Conclusion” and “Afterword”

 

 

FINAL EXAMINATION:  Wednesday, May 10, 12:00-3:00 p.m., Beck Auditorium