(an)thony s. gillies

the ‘a’, ‘n’, and ‘h’ in anthony are all silent. (so is the ‘7’, but that is also invisible.) and anthony is usually spelled thony. the ‘e’ in gillies is also silent — someone once told me it’s a scottish thing — but that never affects the spelling.

• home
• about
• blog
• papers
  • recent
  • drafts
  • other
• cv

the ‘a’, ‘n’, and ‘h’ in anthony are all silent. (so is the ‘7’, but that is also invisible.) and anthony is usually spelled thony. the ‘e’ in gillies is also silent — someone once told me it’s a scottish thing — but that never affects the spelling.

• Indicative Conditionals
  in: Delia Graff Fara and Gillian Russell (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language [2012] draft

• Might Made Right (with Kai von Fintel)
  in: Andy Egan and Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality (Oxford University Press) [2011]
  draft

• Iffiness
  semantics & pragmatics 3(4): 1-42.
  doi:10.3765/sp.3.4

• Must…Stay…Strong! (with Kai von Fintel)
  Natural Language Semantics 18(4): 351-383 [2010]
  doi: 10.1007/s11050-010-9058-2 // open access post-print

• On Truth-Conditions for If (But Not Quite Only If)
  Philosophical Review, 118(3):325-349 [2009]
  doi:10.1215/00318108-2009-002 // local file

• CIA Leaks (with Kai von Fintel)
  Philosophical Review, 117(1): 77-98 [2008]
  doi:10.1215/00318108-2007-025 // local file

• Counterfactual Scorekeeping
  Linguistics & Philosophy 30: 329-360 [2007]
  doi:10.1007/s10988-007-9018-6 // local file

• An Opinionated Guide to Epistemic Modality (with Kai von Fintel)
  in: Gendler & Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology 2 [2007]
  draft

• What Might Be the Case After a Change in View
  Journal of Philosophical Logic 35(2): 117-145 [2006]
  doi:10.1007/s10992-005-9006-7 // local file

• Epistemic Conditionals and Conditional Epistemics
  Noûs 38: 585-616 [2004]
  doi:10.1111/j.0029- 4624.2004.00485.x // local file

• New Foundations for Epistemic Change
  Synthese 138: 1-44 [2004]
  doi:10.1023/B:SYNT.0000012202.66263.b2 // local file

• A New Solution to Moore’s Paradox
  Philosophical Studies 105: 237-250 [2001]
  doi:10.1023/A:1010361708803 // local file